Researchers Publish Climate Surveys in SRA Revealing Public Alarm and Skepticism

U.S and U.K – based researchers have conducted nationwide studies between 2002 and 2010 relating to global warming and climate change, which indicate a significant shift in opinions, images, words, thoughts, and positive or negative feelings of the general public.

One of the studies, "The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism: Exploring Affective Image Associations in the United States Over Time", was conducted by Drs. Nicholas Smith and Anthony Leiserowitz of the Yale University School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, which was published by the Society for Risk Analysis in their journal Risk Analysis (June 2012 issue). The study was based on four surveys that were conducted in 2003, 2007, 2008, and 2010.

The findings revealed that in 2002, 20%of the Americans related global warming with melting ice, but by 2010 the number decreased to about 10%. Similarly, people’s opinions of "alarmist" disaster images, for instance the end of everything increased between the years 2002 to 2008, and then slightly declined in 2010. The technique used in the survey is a form of free association where people were provided with a word like global warming, and they had to note down the first word that comes to mind, and then had to provide an affective rating (e.g., +3 = a very good thing and -3 = a very bad thing).

The other study "The Psychological Distance of Climate Change", conducted by Dr. Alexa Spence, of The University of Nottingham, U.K., and Dr. Wouter Poortinga and Professor Nick Pidgeon, from Cardiff University, U.K., was also published in Risk Analysis (June 2012 issue). 1,822 people were interviewed for the study between January and March 2010. The researchers studied the connection of psychological dimensions of distance along with social, temporal and geographical distance to climate change. The conclusion derived from the study is that lower psychological distance was connected with higher concern regarding climate change, thus communications relating to climate risk has to emphasize on bringing the problem psychologically closer.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

G.P. Thomas

Written by

G.P. Thomas

Gary graduated from the University of Manchester with a first-class honours degree in Geochemistry and a Masters in Earth Sciences. After working in the Australian mining industry, Gary decided to hang up his geology boots and turn his hand to writing. When he isn't developing topical and informative content, Gary can usually be found playing his beloved guitar, or watching Aston Villa FC snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, G.P.. (2019, March 01). Researchers Publish Climate Surveys in SRA Revealing Public Alarm and Skepticism. AZoCleantech. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=16778.

  • MLA

    Thomas, G.P.. "Researchers Publish Climate Surveys in SRA Revealing Public Alarm and Skepticism". AZoCleantech. 22 November 2024. <https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=16778>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, G.P.. "Researchers Publish Climate Surveys in SRA Revealing Public Alarm and Skepticism". AZoCleantech. https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=16778. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, G.P.. 2019. Researchers Publish Climate Surveys in SRA Revealing Public Alarm and Skepticism. AZoCleantech, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=16778.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.