Posted in | News | Renewable Energy | Energy | Hydrogen

Project to Create System for Large-Scale Synthesis of Clean Hydrogen

Download PDF Copy

Reviewed

Mar 26 2021

Engineers from École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) are participating in PROMETEO—an EU research project to produce hydrogen on a huge scale from renewable sources, as part of a measure to reduce industrial carbon emissions.

Hydrogen is an ideally clean energy source, whether as a storage medium or as a fuel. But the processes employed to produce it are not clean, as they still depend chiefly on electricity or fossil fuels such as coal, gas, and oil.

At the beginning of 2021, an EU project called PROMETEO was started. Under this project, engineers will work to design a new system for the large-scale synthesis of clean hydrogen, by making use of only renewable energy sources. This would enable a decrease in the carbon emissions of several significant manufacturing industries. Jan Van Herle’s research group at EPFL Valais-Wallis in Sion is also a part of this initiative.

The concept is to construct a prototype that makes use of electrolysis to derive hydrogen from water—the “H” in H₂O. However, instead of using water in its liquid state, as is generally done, the new system will make use of steam and solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) technology, which requires temperatures of more than 700 °C. The heat and energy required to operate the prototype will be completely obtained from solar energy.

It is anticipated that the prototype will generate around 15 kg of hydrogen daily. To tackle solar energy’s intermittent nature due to changes in sunlight, the engineers will test a novel plan for handling the several phases of energy conversion (electrolysis, producing electricity, and maintaining the electrolyzer in a “hot stand-by” mode).

Their approach includes reducing drawdown from the power grid and enhancing generation from stored renewables whenever solar energy (or wind energy for the electrolysis phase) is not available.

By using steam electrolysis to supply hydrogen, our system will use a third less power than is currently required for water electrolysis. This is already a huge savings, as power is the most expensive budget item in an electrolysis plant's operating costs.

Jan Van Herle, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

“But the real advantage of solid oxide technology is that it is also reversible, meaning it can generate power on demand, which is then fed into the grid. Our converter will always be operational in one direction or the other, overcoming the problem of intermittency and making the most efficient use of solar heat and energy. Conventional liquid water electrolysers, on the other hand, spend a lot of time sitting idle,” added Herle, whose team is specialized in SOE.

The Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), which will lead an interdisciplinary consortium of nine European organizations, including EPFL, will be coordinating PROMETEO. This pioneering, 3.5-year project has obtained financial support of €2.5 million from the European Commission.

The aim of this project is to help fulfill the Commission’s climate targets for 2030 and 2050, especially by promoting the adoption of renewable energy sources by industries that make use of a large amount of hydrogen, like the metallurgy, petrochemicals, hydrogen fuel-cell industries, and methanol and ammonia synthesis.

Moreover, PROMETEO engineers will investigate the ability to reproduce their process on an industrial scale. SOLIDpower, the company that designed the technology, has already demonstrated a system that can generate up to 50 kg of hydrogen daily and is currently working on scaling this up.

Source:

https://www.epfl.ch/en/

Download PDF Copy

Comments

George Kafantaris says:

March 27, 2021 at 12:02 AM

While Europe, Asia, Australia, Canada -- even Russia, and Saudi Arabia -- are busy laying out plans for hydrogen, the folks at our Department of Energy are paralyzed trying to figure out which will come first -- the hydrogen infrastructure or the hydrogen industry itself that will need to use it. Meanwhile, our oil companies, as well as our car companies, have buried their heads in the sand. Oil companies want to drill for more oil when demand for it is diminishing and car companies want to make battery cars when we have no grid capacity to charge them. And we are frantically searching for the ideal battery, ignoring the fact that even if we find it, it will still need to be charged through our anemic grid.
If hydrogen is indeed our only effective means to fight climate change at scale, then we should start with the hydrogen infrastructure itself. Why make it a two-step solution (battery-hydrogen) when we can go directly to hydrogen and get there faster? Even our present two-step solution will need hydrogen. Yes, the proponents of battery cars that have been busy ridiculing hydrogen will need it themselves to power hydrogen generators to charge their battery cars. And of course, we will need to deliver hydrogen to our factories to make steel, cement, and fertilizer -- and to power our airplanes before it becomes unpopular to fly with jet fuel.
But how would we be able to deliver all this hydrogen across our vast land? The same way we deliver natural gas -- with pipelines. Indeed, we can even use our existing gas pipelines if we simply reline them with plastic inserts, as they are doing now in the UK -- or as we are doing here when steel pipes start leaking. And as far as setting up the hydrogen infrastructure is concerned; we should stop conflating the source of the hydrogen with the means of delivering it. One has nothing to do with the other. Arguments against the source of hydrogen should not get in the way of us setting up a safe and efficient way to deliver it to those that need it.

0 0

Reply