Construction Materials as a Solution for Carbon Dioxide Storage

An article recently published in Science investigated the potential of building materials as significant reservoirs for carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. This innovative approach addresses the growing need for CO2 removal technologies amid rising greenhouse gas emissions. The researchers highlighted that modifying conventional building materials could sequester approximately 16.6 billion tons of CO2 annually, supporting global efforts to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

carbon storage in construction industry

Image Credit: Gargantiopa/Shutterstock.com

Advancement in Carbon Storage Technology

The urgent need to address climate change has led to the development of innovative technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Among these, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies have emerged as a key solution, aiming to lower emissions and remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Traditional carbon capture and storage (CCS) methods primarily target point-source emissions but often fail to address atmospheric CO2 levels.

Recent advancements in material science have introduced techniques to embed carbon into building materials, transforming the built environment into a carbon sink. The total mass of infrastructure materials produced between 1900 and 2015 is roughly comparable to the combined weight of global food, animal feed, and energy resources, highlighting their potential for carbon storage. By modifying these materials, researchers aim to develop products capable of storing carbon over long periods, supporting net-zero emission goals.

About the Research: Building Material as a Storage Solution

This paper explored the potential of storing CO2 in common building materials, including concrete, brick, asphalt, plastic, and wood. They estimated that replacing traditional materials with CO2-storing alternatives could store up to 16.6 billion tons of CO2 annually, roughly half of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions recorded in 2021.

To achieve this, the researchers focused on replacing conventional construction materials with available options that either store biogenic carbon or enable CO2 mineralization.

The study emphasized the importance of material durability and consumption scale rather than carbon density per unit mass as key factors influencing overall storage capacity.

The carbon storage potential was calculated using 2016 data, the most recent year with comprehensive material consumption statistics. The assessment assumed all stored carbon originated from atmospheric sources and emphasized the importance of permanent storage solutions. The alternative materials were evaluated based on their carbon density and production scale, providing a comparative view of their CO2 storage capabilities.

Key Findings: Implications for Climate Mitigation

The study demonstrated that building materials possess significant carbon storage potential, with concrete aggregates contributing the largest share. Concrete and asphalt pavement could store approximately 11.5 ± 1 billion tons of CO2 annually. Although bio-based plastics exhibit the highest carbon storage potential per kilogram, their contribution is constrained due to their lower production volumes.

Alternative cement, such as magnesium oxide-based types, could absorb up to 0.9 kg of CO2 per kilogram of binder, potentially storing up to 2.6 billion tons of CO2. Incorporating biomass fibers into bricks could store around 0.8 billion tons of CO2, while mineral carbonation processes could further enhance brick storage potential.

The authors suggested that optimizing building materials for carbon storage could enable the cumulative storage of over 1,200 billion tons of CO2 by 2100, surpassing international climate targets. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses demonstrated that material consumption volume is the primary driver of carbon storage capacity. Adopting carbon-storing materials could provide significant climate benefits and economic advantages by reducing reliance on costly geological or terrestrial carbon storage methods.

Practical Applications: Transforming Construction Practices

This research has important implications for carbon management strategies in construction. Integrating carbon-storing materials can help builders and policymakers reduce the carbon footprint of construction projects. This approach addresses emissions from traditional materials and provides a sustainable way to store carbon. By incorporating these materials into building projects, stakeholders can actively contribute to climate change mitigation while meeting the growing demand for sustainable construction.

The study highlights the need for policies that encourage the adoption of carbon-storing materials, especially in rapidly urbanizing regions. These materials can be cost-competitive with traditional options, such as industrial waste and agricultural residues. The authors suggest that implementing carbon-storing technologies by 2025, 2050, or 2075 could enable significant cumulative CO2 storage, exceeding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) targets for limiting global temperature rise.

Conclusion: Toward Carbon Neutrality

Building materials have significant potential to address climate change. By leveraging their carbon storage capabilities, the construction industry can contribute meaningfully to CO2 removal efforts.

As the demand for sustainable construction grows, integrating carbon-storing materials will be crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These findings pave the way for a more sustainable built environment.

Future work should focus on optimizing the production processes of these materials, ensuring their long-term durability, and exploring additional construction applications. Collaboration among scientists, industry stakeholders, and policymakers will be essential to fully utilize these materials' potential in combating the climate crisis.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Source:

Roijen, V, E., Miller, S, A., & Davis, S, J. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO2 annually. Science, 2024, 387, 6730. DOI: 10.1126/science.adq8594, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq8594

Muhammad Osama

Written by

Muhammad Osama

Muhammad Osama is a full-time data analytics consultant and freelance technical writer based in Delhi, India. He specializes in transforming complex technical concepts into accessible content. He has a Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering with specialization in AI & Robotics from Galgotias University, India, and he has extensive experience in technical content writing, data science and analytics, and artificial intelligence.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Osama, Muhammad. (2025, January 20). Construction Materials as a Solution for Carbon Dioxide Storage. AZoCleantech. Retrieved on January 20, 2025 from https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=35481.

  • MLA

    Osama, Muhammad. "Construction Materials as a Solution for Carbon Dioxide Storage". AZoCleantech. 20 January 2025. <https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=35481>.

  • Chicago

    Osama, Muhammad. "Construction Materials as a Solution for Carbon Dioxide Storage". AZoCleantech. https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=35481. (accessed January 20, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Osama, Muhammad. 2025. Construction Materials as a Solution for Carbon Dioxide Storage. AZoCleantech, viewed 20 January 2025, https://www.azocleantech.com/news.aspx?newsID=35481.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.