Editorial Feature

Are Solar-Powered Planes the Future of Aviation?

Image Credit: Shutterstock/BokehStore

Aviation has come a long way since the Wright Brothers first took to the skies early in the 20th Century. Gone are the flimsy glider assemblies that carried a single person: today’s aeroplanes are gargantuan structures that can transport hundreds of people from A to B at almost 600 miles an hour.

Effects of Modern Aviation

Modern aviation is, however, incredibly polluting, accounting for approximately 3% of the human global warming footprint. This is likely to grow as countries become more developed and people jet off for holidays or on business trips. It has been suggested that we need to think about how we fly, and the aviation industry is under enormous pressure to reduce carbon dioxide emissions post-2020 to help mitigate climate change.

The good news is that steps are already being taken: older planes reaching retirement are replaced with ones that are more fuel efficient; and flights are being scheduled to ensure fewer empty seats.

But what more can be done? Should aircraft be slimmed down or redesigned, or could air traffic operations become more streamlined? Other ideas under investigation include the use of biofuels over jet fuels, fuel cells, or solar-powered planes.

Solar-Powered Aircraft

In 2015, Solar Impulse 2, a solar-powered single-seat aircraft with a wingspan wider than a Boeing 747, became the first solar aeroplane to complete an oceanic crossing, flying from Japan to Hawaii using nothing but solar power. This is the ultimate goal for solar-powered aircraft - achieving continuous flight.

It’s a simple concept: the wings are covered in solar cells – Solar Impulse 2 has 17,000 across its jumbo-jet sized wings – which harvest the sun’s energy. Some of this energy is used immediately to power the propulsion system and onboard instruments, the rest is harnessed in a rechargeable energy storage system – four lithium-polymer batteries in the case of Solar Impulse 2 – to power flight at night. This is enough to carry around two tonnes of weight – including a single passenger at a top speed of 43 miles per hour.

Furthermore, it releases no harmful exhaust gases, there is no contamination of the atmosphere and it is eco-friendly.

That may seem impressive – and perhaps it is for this early stage technology – but when you consider a Boeing 747-400 although heavier and more polluting, can transport 400 passengers at 570 miles per hour, not so much. There still needs to be some huge advances made before a solar-powered aircraft can be used commercially.

 

However, is the idea of using solar-powered aeroplanes a good one? Yes and no – perhaps for those who fly recreationally, the slow speed of the light-weight solar-powered aircraft isn’t a problem. However for those who need to get from one side of the world to the other, the traditional jet-fuelled plane is still the better option.

Advances in Aircraft Design

If not solar power, what? Redesigning current planes is an option being explored – the next generation of planes could have open rotor engines, and complete carbon fibre frames. NASA and Boeing are currently exploring the design of the wings suggesting longer, thinner wings supported by a truss could cut fuel use by up to 50%. Their current design performs incredibly well in wind tunnel experiments, but changing the whole design is a big risk – especially if it turns out to be wrong – so it’s unlikely to be seen in new aircraft just yet.

The use of low-carbon biofuels is another option, and it is hoped that it could replace up to 30% of jet-fuel by 2050. The fuel is likely to be made of cellulosic biomass – grasses and inedible parts of plants – or algae. While some planes have already flown on experimental fuels made from green sources, its not certain that the required quantities of such fuel would be available for its widespread use. Scaling up the process used to create the fuel is difficult, and biofuels are still expensive – approximately 3-4 times more than jet fuel, although this price may decrease as production increases.

Conclusion

Solar-powered aircrafts may not be the future of commercial aviation – redesigned planes powered by greener fuels are more likely to take the crown, but could it have a place in recreational flight – time will tell.

References and Further Reading

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Kerry Taylor-Smith

Written by

Kerry Taylor-Smith

Kerry has been a freelance writer, editor, and proofreader since 2016, specializing in science and health-related subjects. She has a degree in Natural Sciences at the University of Bath and is based in the UK.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Taylor-Smith, Kerry. (2020, May 07). Are Solar-Powered Planes the Future of Aviation?. AZoCleantech. Retrieved on November 24, 2024 from https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=734.

  • MLA

    Taylor-Smith, Kerry. "Are Solar-Powered Planes the Future of Aviation?". AZoCleantech. 24 November 2024. <https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=734>.

  • Chicago

    Taylor-Smith, Kerry. "Are Solar-Powered Planes the Future of Aviation?". AZoCleantech. https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=734. (accessed November 24, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Taylor-Smith, Kerry. 2020. Are Solar-Powered Planes the Future of Aviation?. AZoCleantech, viewed 24 November 2024, https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=734.

Comments

  1. ptak dodo ptak dodo Australia says:

    Bio-fuels produce pretty much the same amount of CO2 as fossil fuels when burnt: they are not : clean. At best they can be considered "CO2 neutral" - as the CO2 produced during burning process has been previously removed from the atmosphere by plants. Apart from that - CO2 is not a pollutant: it is a basic building block of life as we know it. All living things breathe and produce CO2. And now we are trying to make improvements to the process ? Maybe - by holding breath ?

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoCleantech.com.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.